E-E-A-T Content Auditor

Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness — Google Search Quality Rater framework for judging content quality, especially on YMYL (Your Money or Your Life) topics.

Paste article text or full HTML and the tool runs 22 checks across the four pillars — first-person signals, author credentials, citations, schema, disclosures — returning a 100-point score and prioritized fix list.

No. To stay client-side and private, it analyzes only what you paste. For best results, paste full HTML so the tool can read schema, images, and links.

Yes, the E-E-A-T Content Auditor is 100% free with no registration, no hidden fees, and no usage limits. All processing happens locally in your browser, ensuring complete privacy.

Absolutely. The E-E-A-T Content Auditor processes everything client-side in your browser. No data is uploaded to or stored on any server. Your content remains private on your device at all times.

Yes, the E-E-A-T Content Auditor is fully responsive and works on smartphones and tablets. You can use it on any device with a modern web browser -- no app download required.

No account or registration is needed. Simply open the E-E-A-T Content Auditor in your browser and start using it immediately. There are no sign-up walls or usage restrictions.

Yes, the E-E-A-T Content Auditor is built following current Google Search guidelines and best practices. We regularly update the tool to reflect changes in search engine requirements.

Simply enter your input in the provided field, adjust any settings to your preference, and the tool will process it instantly. You can then copy the result to your clipboard or download it.

The E-E-A-T Content Auditor works in all modern browsers including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, and Opera. For the best experience, use the latest version of your preferred browser.

E-E-A-T and YMYL describe different things. E-E-A-T — Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness — is the lens Google's quality raters use to judge how reliable a page and its creator are. YMYL, "Your Money or Your Life," describes the topic itself: pages about health, finance, legal, or safety matters that could affect a reader's wellbeing, money, or rights if the advice is wrong. The connection is that YMYL pages are held to a much stricter E-E-A-T standard, because thin, anonymous, or unsourced content on those subjects can cause real harm. Non-YMYL pages, like a hobby or recipe post, can rank well with lighter trust signals. This auditor scores the four E-E-A-T pillars so you can see whether your trust signals match the seriousness of your topic before publishing.

The auditor runs a structured set of checks split evenly across the four pillars, with each pillar — Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness — worth 25 points for a 100-point total. Every individual check returns a pass, partial, or fail result and contributes points accordingly, so a partial credit still moves your score. Checks cover things like first-person language, author byline and credentials, citations to authoritative sources, structured data, publication and updated dates, HTTPS, and disclosure and privacy links. Each check also carries a high, medium, or low severity rating, which is used to sort the issues list rather than to weight the points. The final number is the sum of points earned across all checks. Paste your content to see the per-pillar breakdown and the exact checks you passed or missed.

The depth of the audit depends on what the tool can actually read. Plain article text only exposes language signals — first-person phrasing, stated credentials, numeric claims from hands-on testing, and disclosure wording — so checks that depend on page structure get partial or estimated credit. Pasting full page HTML unlocks the complete audit: the tool parses your JSON-LD schema types, counts images, inspects outbound links to high-authority domains, and detects privacy, contact, and about links. Those structural signals make up a large share of the Authoritativeness and Trustworthiness pillars, so a text-only audit can understate a page that is actually well marked up. For the most reliable score, copy the rendered HTML of the published or preview page rather than just the body copy, then paste it into the tool.

No. E-E-A-T is not a direct ranking factor you can dial in like a title tag. It is the framework Google's human quality raters use to evaluate sample results, and those judgments inform how the ranking systems are trained — they do not feed a live score into your page. A high number from this auditor means the visible trust signals are present: a real author, credentials, citations, schema, dates, and disclosures. It does not confirm that the content is genuinely experienced, accurate, or better than competing pages, which still has to be earned through real reporting and good writing. Treat the score as a checklist that surfaces missing signals, not a verdict on quality or a ranking prediction. Run the audit, close the highest-severity gaps first, then re-run it as you keep improving the actual content.

Low scores usually come from missing identity and trust signals rather than weak writing. To strengthen Expertise, add a clear author byline with stated credentials — a real name, relevant qualifications, or years of experience — and link it to an author bio. For Authoritativeness, cite and link out to high-authority sources, add Article, Organization, or Person structured data, and show both a publication date and a "last updated" date. For Trustworthiness, serve the page over HTTPS, include contact information, link a privacy policy, and add affiliate or sponsorship disclosures where relevant. For Experience, write in the first person about what you actually tested, include specific numbers, and use original images. The auditor collects every failed and partial check into a prioritized fix list sorted by severity, so paste your content and work down that list from the top.